Duk
Verde
Verde
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:15 pm
Location: South Australia

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Duk »

Giuliettaevo2 wrote:here some bracing of the lower parts...

Image
Wow, whole new chassis rails 8) .
Dedicated track car?
User avatar
Dennis
Gold
Gold
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 8:44 am
Location: Amersfoort, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Dennis »

no, this is a streetcar. The guy who owned the car works in a raceteam that modifies it's racecars this way. There is additional bracing from the enginebay aswell, on the racecars that is.

This setup is also on my racecar. It absolutely transforms the handling.
'81 GTV6 3.0 QV
'91 75 TS (track)
'02 BMW 330i Touring
User avatar
Mats
Verde
Verde
Posts: 4059
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:26 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Mats »

Sits below the original ones? Or is the engine raised in the pictures? Control arm fixing points lowered? :?:
Or is it going inside the original rail? Why is the sump lower surface so different in height to what I'm used to see? :?
Mats Strandberg
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-

GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
Duk
Verde
Verde
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:15 pm
Location: South Australia

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Duk »

Mats wrote:Or is it going inside the original rail? Why is the sump lower surface so different in height to what I'm used to see? :?
Looks like new rails are inside the originals to me.
Maybe the sump looking strange is a bit of an optical illusion. Because of the new rails extending forwards and staying horizontal when you're use to seeing the chassis sweep up :? Maybe :?:

Still quite amazed at how major that is for a road car.
User avatar
Maurizio
Verde
Verde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Maurizio »

Mats wrote:Sits below the original ones? Or is the engine raised in the pictures? Control arm fixing points lowered? :?:
Or is it going inside the original rail? Why is the sump lower surface so different in height to what I'm used to see? :?
Original rail was opened and square tube shoved in, rest is standard, strange look is from the foto angle.

I had interest in the car (a lot other nice upgrades on this TS) but this tubing made it a no-no for me.

I don't like to comment on something when there is no one who can defend his own work.

But the need/effectiveness/outcome on this particular car wasn't done very nicely in my book. If you go into so much trouble with converting, I like to recognize knowledge behind it.
The basic idea is good but it has to be done with more care for detail.

So it is wise to have some decent knowledge of strength / stiffness and how to couple new and original steel by welding in an efficient way.
Banned.. ? ;-) Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d Image
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool :twisted: ==> definitely BANNED!

AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
User avatar
Zamani
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1758
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:20 pm
Location: Cameroon

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Zamani »

Maurizio,

For a race car do you recommend putting reinforcement bars inside the fenders as you described earlier (except for the "yellow" brace in your drawing).

What do you recommend for reinforcing the lower part of the engine bay?
Dr. Alban
User avatar
Maurizio
Verde
Verde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Maurizio »

Zamani wrote:Maurizio,For a race car do you recommend putting reinforcement bars inside the fenders as you described earlier (except for the "yellow" brace in your drawing).
Yes, best would be a square tube for the horizontal, but Fia doesn't allow square.
A good example see attached picture, just a good connection between original shock towers needs to be added.
Zamani wrote:What do you recommend for reinforcing the lower part of the engine bay?
Bit difficult to describe, haven't done it myself (yet)
The basic idea before was good, the details makes it better.

I give it a try, so in a nut shell my ideas :D
Instead of a square tube, I would use a H beam. The largest loading forces from the A-arms are horizontal (when cornering) thus the two walls placed vertical.
The H-beam runs until the mounting point of the torsion bars. At the A-arms position I would drill a large(r) hole through the horizontal plate of the H-beam. A tube to create an encapsulated through hole for the A-arm bolts. From the tube an X bracing under 30 deg towards the outside of the beam.

A section cut would look like this (only x more spread):
.\ . /
-- o --
. / . \

The bottom of the H (towards the street) could be closed with thin (0.7-1 [mm]) sheet.
Good care has to be taken in welding new to the old sheet metal.
A good idea would be to put the front ar bar on the new, much stiffer construction.
Attachments
rollcage_TimDeLeeuw.jpg
rollcage_TimDeLeeuw.jpg (35.88 KiB) Viewed 7185 times
Banned.. ? ;-) Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d Image
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool :twisted: ==> definitely BANNED!

AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
TNT
Silver
Silver
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Athens Greece/Koeln DE

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by TNT »

While i was listening to Billy Idol (white wedding) i took a look at the picture (the one that i attached) of the SZ Chassis. It seems to be quite different than the ordinary 116 chassis and i don't mean the obvious, that it is a 2 door coupe, what i think is that the front part is "boxed" , the A pillar is connected to the V of the fender via this "box". I can't explain it better so have a look yourself guys.

cheers
Attachments
follow the red arrow neo
follow the red arrow neo
SZ Rahmen_Zwo.jpg (131.6 KiB) Viewed 7055 times
Duk
Verde
Verde
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:15 pm
Location: South Australia

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Duk »

Very interesting considering every thing I'd been able to find on the SZ says that they were built on a shortened standard 75 chassis.
darryl longley
Gold
Gold
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 2:03 pm

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by darryl longley »

Duk wrote:Very interesting considering every thing I'd been able to find on the SZ says that they were built on a shortened standard 75 chassis.
how much shorter than the 75 is the sz,like gtv6 shorter?
Duk
Verde
Verde
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:15 pm
Location: South Australia

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Duk »

darryl longley wrote:how much shorter than the 75 is the sz,like gtv6 shorter?
Since you asked, I had a quick web search and found this http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/ ... dimensions, but it's the same wheel base dimentions as the pic. Strange as I'd read more than once that they were shorter http://www.alfaworkshop.co.uk/alfa_sz.shtml:
Attachments
75_specs.jpg
75_specs.jpg (49.13 KiB) Viewed 6860 times
User avatar
Maurizio
Verde
Verde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Maurizio »

from the SZ source: http://home.planet.nl/~evdbeek/es-30.html

Dimensions:
- Wheelbase: 2.510 m.
- Track: front 1.464 m /rear: 1,426 m
- Length: 4.060 m.
- Width: 1.730 m.
- Height: 1.300 m.
Banned.. ? ;-) Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d Image
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool :twisted: ==> definitely BANNED!

AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
Duk
Verde
Verde
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:15 pm
Location: South Australia

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Duk »

SZ Track: front 1464 mm rear 1426 mm
75 Track: front 1396 mm rear 1382 mm

Is the difference in track purely from wheel offset?

68mm more track width would make noticable differance to the behaviour of the front. But a 34mm change to the wheel offset would have a pretty major effect on the scrub radius of the steering.
User avatar
Maurizio
Verde
Verde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Maurizio »

Duk wrote:SZ Track: front 1464 mm rear 1426 mm
75 Track: front 1396 mm rear 1382 mm

Is the difference in track purely from wheel offset?

68mm more track width would make noticable differance to the behaviour of the front. But a 34mm change to the wheel offset would have a pretty major effect on the scrub radius of the steering.
An sz runs 7x16 et 7 in front and 8x16 et 20 wheels in the back.
I have run these wheels on my V6 and it works pretty well.
Only the 75 chassis is at the front not that happy with the wide wheels :lol:
Banned.. ? ;-) Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d Image
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool :twisted: ==> definitely BANNED!

AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
User avatar
Mats
Verde
Verde
Posts: 4059
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:26 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Chassis Bracing and Seam Welding

Post by Mats »

Duk wrote:SZ Track: front 1464 mm rear 1426 mm
75 Track: front 1396 mm rear 1382 mm

Is the difference in track purely from wheel offset?

68mm more track width would make noticable differance to the behaviour of the front. But a 34mm change to the wheel offset would have a pretty major effect on the scrub radius of the steering.
They quote a lot of different tracks in the workshop manuals due to the wheels, so yes, I'd say the wheels.
Mats Strandberg
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-

GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
Post Reply