Post Reply
User avatar
mjr
Platinum
Platinum
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:01 pm
Location: G Britain

Oil seperator

Post by mjr »

One thing is really starting to irritate me on this car. euro spec 2.5, 60,000 miles on an excellent engine with no problems, uses oil as per the factory manual. but I have noticed it doesn't take more than a few weeks of driving after an intake service, for the accordian section to end up with fresh oil in it again. I know it doesnt really casue any problems, but it annoys me knowing its there, and having to clean out the AAV 3 times a year. What is it about these engines that they put so much oil up through the crank case breathers? Anyone had success with a better oil seperator or additional one to reduce this?
User avatar
Rookie ROX
Gold
Gold
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:29 pm
Location: Brisvegas, Australia
Contact:

Post by Rookie ROX »

If you're concerned about keeping it clean, simply replace it with a catch can. Same job done, just goes into the can rather than back into the intake.

ROCK ON
R~R
Duk
Verde
Verde
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:15 pm
Location: South Australia

Re: Oil seperator

Post by Duk »

mjr wrote:I know it doesnt really casue any problems,
Actually, it is more of a problem than most people accept. Hot oily blow by gas has an octane reducing effect (promotes detonation) and helps to cause carbon deposits in the combustion chambers, which can also promote detonation/pre-ignition.
mjr wrote:What is it about these engines that they put so much oil up through the crank case breathers?
Most engines tend to breath a bit. I did read an article about the early LS1 powered Holden Commodores here in Australia, having massive oil consumption issues even when new. The story said theat the cars suffered from a combination of pore ring seal and a badly designed crank case ventilation system. The fix was an effective oil/air seperator that scrubbed the blow by gas of the oil mist, causing the oil to condence and fall out of the gas flow, and then it was returned to the sump via a 1 way valve. The design was apparently very effective, reducing oil consumption from being about 1 litre per 1000km :shock: (they said it was bad!) down to an almost immeasurable drop in oil level between changes.

I've not seen under the rocker cover of the V6 (yet), but is there any baffling to prevent oil being flung directly up the crankcase breather tube from the camshaft?

I know it doesn't realy answer your question about 'why', but it may provide you with a solution to your (and probably everybody else's) blow by oil mist question without going to a smelly and illegal oil catch can.
User avatar
sh0rtlife
Verde
Verde
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 7:45 am
Location: portland, oregon, USA

Post by sh0rtlife »

ya know...i dont think there is a baffle...and i know on mine it too blows far to much oil and was going to go with catchcan of my own design....the 1way valve to drop it back into the sump is a GREAT idea that i hadnt thought of
Image
User avatar
PietereQ
Platinum
Platinum
Posts: 477
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:53 am
Location: PL/NL

Post by PietereQ »

sh0rtlife wrote:ya know...i dont think there is a baffle...and i know on mine it too blows far to much oil and was going to go with catchcan of my own design....the 1way valve to drop it back into the sump is a GREAT idea that i hadnt thought of
Shouldn't the contents of the catch can be never returned into the oil system?
User avatar
Rookie ROX
Gold
Gold
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:29 pm
Location: Brisvegas, Australia
Contact:

Post by Rookie ROX »

PietereQ wrote:
sh0rtlife wrote: Shouldn't the contents of the catch can be never returned into the oil system?
That's supposed to be the point yes.

Duk, I know in Australia a catch can is only illegal if it has the small breather that vents to the atmosphere. If it doesn't, not a problem.

ROCK ON
R~R
User avatar
Mats
Verde
Verde
Posts: 4059
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:26 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Mats »

Why not return it to the oil system?
Mats Strandberg
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-

GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
User avatar
PietereQ
Platinum
Platinum
Posts: 477
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:53 am
Location: PL/NL

Post by PietereQ »

Because a black goo made of oil, vapor, fuel and whatever else is not a good additive to oil? :wink: Many people just drain it periodicaly.
User avatar
Mats
Verde
Verde
Posts: 4059
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:26 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Mats »

Well, it is aerosol from inside the crank-case or from under the valve covers so it can't really be all that bad or your engine needs a rebuild. Normally it is automatically drained back to the sump from the separator (as in the Alfa std install) and only a small amount is passed into the intake.
Mats Strandberg
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-

GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
User avatar
mjr
Platinum
Platinum
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:01 pm
Location: G Britain

Post by mjr »

that "small amount" is messy IMO.
MR2 Zig
Verde
Verde
Posts: 766
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:47 pm
Location: Fresno, Ca.
Contact:

Post by MR2 Zig »

not if it doesn't get out.....ie its put back into the sump.
User avatar
Mats
Verde
Verde
Posts: 4059
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:26 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Mats »

mjr wrote:that "small amount" is messy IMO.
Well, the small amount is led into the intake (stock), we were as far as I can understand, talking about draining the stuff that is caught in the can back into the sump.

What you do with the other end of the hose is up to you (up yer nose? :) ).
Mats Strandberg
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-

GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
Post Reply