My piston problem is finally solved. I have found lot of good experiences via this forum, so I would like to share mine in this topic.
All available choices I found, were whether too heavy or too expensive, so had to go on custom pistons. I had long conversations with Finnish speed shop who sells Venolias, and with Paul Spruell who have 85mm JE option for TS engines.
Venolias list pistons for TS are quite heavy due to original like basic design. The valve reliefs and top bulge seems to be improved when compared to TS std pistons (see Mickes picture earlier). Venolia could make them lighter, or pistons could be machined lighter on speed shop, but that's long way to go. If I was choosing Venolias, the complete new design would be the way. That's a bit costly but also somewhat risky way due to lack of experiments.
What comes to JE's, Paul already have almost the right pistons for these needs, so JE's were much better start for this customing process.
Things to be changed were the bore and valve reliefs. 85mm goes over 2000 cc which would mean 60kg higher minimum weight on the racing class. That can't be tolerated in any point of view. The choices were done between std 84mm and 84.8mm bores. I ended up to std bore in few reasons. The std liners have hardened surface, which might be gone if reboring them to 84.8. Secondly new liners would not cost much more than reboring. There is also more head gaskets available for std bore.
Because I wan't try different cams in future, there must be enough valve to piston clearance. Even with stock cams, the valve to piston clearance was the limiting factor when dynoing the car. I use nord rods, stock valve reliefs on pistons, 46mm intake valves and VVT operates on opposite direction (advancing cam timing at mid rpm range with reduced travel..).
Paul offered his help on this and will design needed modifications. The plan is to have pistons with std 84mm bore, 5mm deeper valve relief on intake side and 3mm on exhaust (compared to stock TS pistons). The compression ratio is going to be 11:1 (or 12.1 with nord rods).
The 85mm versio weights 336g, so the 84mm can't be far from that. I also desided to go with light 70g pins
Now I feel quite confident with this piston issue and just keep waiting for them
Kimmo
All available choices I found, were whether too heavy or too expensive, so had to go on custom pistons. I had long conversations with Finnish speed shop who sells Venolias, and with Paul Spruell who have 85mm JE option for TS engines.
Venolias list pistons for TS are quite heavy due to original like basic design. The valve reliefs and top bulge seems to be improved when compared to TS std pistons (see Mickes picture earlier). Venolia could make them lighter, or pistons could be machined lighter on speed shop, but that's long way to go. If I was choosing Venolias, the complete new design would be the way. That's a bit costly but also somewhat risky way due to lack of experiments.
What comes to JE's, Paul already have almost the right pistons for these needs, so JE's were much better start for this customing process.
Things to be changed were the bore and valve reliefs. 85mm goes over 2000 cc which would mean 60kg higher minimum weight on the racing class. That can't be tolerated in any point of view. The choices were done between std 84mm and 84.8mm bores. I ended up to std bore in few reasons. The std liners have hardened surface, which might be gone if reboring them to 84.8. Secondly new liners would not cost much more than reboring. There is also more head gaskets available for std bore.
Because I wan't try different cams in future, there must be enough valve to piston clearance. Even with stock cams, the valve to piston clearance was the limiting factor when dynoing the car. I use nord rods, stock valve reliefs on pistons, 46mm intake valves and VVT operates on opposite direction (advancing cam timing at mid rpm range with reduced travel..).
Paul offered his help on this and will design needed modifications. The plan is to have pistons with std 84mm bore, 5mm deeper valve relief on intake side and 3mm on exhaust (compared to stock TS pistons). The compression ratio is going to be 11:1 (or 12.1 with nord rods).
The 85mm versio weights 336g, so the 84mm can't be far from that. I also desided to go with light 70g pins
Now I feel quite confident with this piston issue and just keep waiting for them
Kimmo
Kimmo / alfatune.fi
Sounds really sweet.
Does the bores have a hardened surface? That sounds wrong, should be regular cast iron, I have successfully honed mine with regular tools and that would have been impossible with a hardened surface.
Does the bores have a hardened surface? That sounds wrong, should be regular cast iron, I have successfully honed mine with regular tools and that would have been impossible with a hardened surface.
Mats Strandberg
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-
GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-
GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
- Maurizio
- Verde
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
- Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)
Nice info, when my machine shop saga not will end soon, I will be shoping for other pistons also...
Std gasket have a bore of 85 mm if I remember correct. I know it is not legal but how is the difference checked , who can tell using 85 mm instead of 84.8 mm pistons.... and there is no substitude for cc'sThings to be changed were the bore and valve reliefs. 85mm goes over 2000 cc which would mean 60kg higher minimum weight on the racing class. That can't be tolerated in any point of view. The choices were done between std 84mm and 84.8mm bores. I ended up to std bore in few reasons. The std liners have hardened surface, which might be gone if reboring them to 84.8. Secondly new liners would not cost much more than reboring. There is also more head gaskets available for std bore.
Banned.. ? Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool ==> definitely BANNED!
AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool ==> definitely BANNED!
AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
I've been told so, but not really sure about it? Does anybody have other opinions? I may be wrong with that. That wasn't only reason for going with std bore, but one favourable aspect.Mats wrote: Does the bores have a hardened surface? That sounds wrong, should be regular cast iron, I have successfully honed mine with regular tools and that would have been impossible with a hardened surface.
Kimmo / alfatune.fi
That's correct, the std gasket have 85mm rings. I guess that's true for other replacement gaskets too, when offering them for 84mm bore. If having 85mm gasket perfectly positioned with 85mm bore, I guess there isn't any problem.Maurizio wrote: Std gasket have a bore of 85 mm if I remember correct. I know it is not legal but how is the difference checked , who can tell using 85 mm instead of 84.8 mm pistons.... and there is no substitude for cc's
How many mm's the fire rings of the gasket can go over the cylinder bore edge? I don't have right answer for that, but have had failures with too small fire rings in past..
I also asked from Spesso if their Nord race gaskets were good for 85mm bore, and the answer was negative, only for 84mm. Of cource can't be 100% sure if the e-mail handler knew everything about the topic.
Opening of engines is very uncommon in our class, but it's possible. Probably you never got caught from that reason, but the real displacement of race cars is one hot topic. I may loose two hp's here
Kimmo
Kimmo / alfatune.fi
The old liners tend to be totally shot after 150-200 tkm.
Of course there are TS engines smoking as well.
In my experience they last much better. Even my father's 164 doesn't smoke with 336 on the odo. My bro's 75 was shot but didn't yet smoke bad with >400 on the clock. I opened two of my 75 TS engines and both have liners in mint conditions. Unknown mileage but enough for sure.
Of course there are TS engines smoking as well.
In my experience they last much better. Even my father's 164 doesn't smoke with 336 on the odo. My bro's 75 was shot but didn't yet smoke bad with >400 on the clock. I opened two of my 75 TS engines and both have liners in mint conditions. Unknown mileage but enough for sure.
Have anyone ever opened a TS engine and found the Pistons not scuffed on the intake side?
The cars I have seen (ts and turbo) have all ran very rich during WOT. Remapping without even touching the hardware usually is very good for power and economy.
The cars I have seen (ts and turbo) have all ran very rich during WOT. Remapping without even touching the hardware usually is very good for power and economy.
Mats Strandberg
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-
GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-
GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
Never seen one.Mats wrote:Have anyone ever opened a TS engine and found the Pistons not scuffed on the intake side?
The cars I have seen (ts and turbo) have all ran very rich during WOT. Remapping without even touching the hardware usually is very good for power and economy.
My TS pistons have some scuff marks on the exhaust side too. Because intake side is the pressure side there should be always more wearing than at exhaust side, but could it really be mostly caused by being too rich at WOT? Maybe high throttle opening at low rpm's could be one big reason as it selves? Shame that there isn't oil spraying holes or nozzles..
Kimmo / alfatune.fi