Alfa Romeo ONLY please!
Post Reply
kterkkila
Gold
Gold
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:00 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by kterkkila »

MD wrote: I guess you'll just have to suck it and see .
That's the plan :)
MD wrote: I do agree with other comments that you may need to better integrate the two components and balance it as a unit before mounting onto the crank. I think it would be a safer and better option with better balancing outcomes.
All pieces are going to be balanced separately to allow mixing components in future. Mean that the crank will be balanced first alone, then with front pulley, then add flywheel (starter gear holder) and balance again, and lastly add the center triangle to complete the assemply and balance once again.

I don't see reason for fixing those two parts together as they will center to each other and the position will be marked?
Kimmo / alfatune.fi
User avatar
Maurizio
Verde
Verde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)

Post by Maurizio »

I don't see reason for fixing those two parts together as they will center to each other and the position will be marked?


I have in other than engine parts and 8000 rpm some very bad experiences . Even with very small tolerances you get an inbalance very fast . (cantilever effect: small positioning hole and a large diameter flywheel). The best way: is balancing assembled and leave the parts as they are mounted. But that will only work in a perfect world :-)

ps the crank of my ts engine is lightened. Had a sketch from a forum member and did my own interpretation :lol: Only will take a long time before I can share experiences. The progress on the engine is very slow......
Banned.. ? ;-) Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d Image
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool :twisted: ==> definitely BANNED!

AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
User avatar
Micke
Verde
Verde
Posts: 810
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:33 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Micke »

Now I'd need some help.

I've been "building", or actually collecting parts and inspiration, for my TS for some time now. Some 10 years ago I bought stiffer valve springs for the old 2.0 and today cleaning my junk finally found them :D

The springs are very strange with 3 springs of which one between the normal inner and outer is "standing on the side". Anybody know these and have any idea if they are any good?

Then if Jim or someone has the critical measures i could check whether they fit my project. What's the needed stiffness and max compressed length with 13 mm cams? What's the open lenght mounted in the engine.

Sorry, some questions might sound dumb, but my engine isn't here and I'm realy curious if these will do.
User avatar
Mats
Verde
Verde
Posts: 4059
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:26 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Mats »

The one that goes in between is really only there as a damper as I understand it, are the springs wound the same direction (as in right or left?) otherwise it can be to keep the springs from coming tangled in some weird accident... :?

Jim will probably have the exact answer though. :P
Mats Strandberg
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-

GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
User avatar
Micke
Verde
Verde
Posts: 810
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:33 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Micke »

That's what I figured as well. Keeping the resonances away. However, I tried and they do flex like springs. Never had any of these before so I'd like to know more.
User avatar
Maurizio
Verde
Verde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)

Post by Maurizio »

Micke, picture?
Banned.. ? ;-) Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d Image
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool :twisted: ==> definitely BANNED!

AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
User avatar
Micke
Verde
Verde
Posts: 810
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:33 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Micke »

A picture of ME?

Oh, I'm flattered. I know I'm handsome but that's a bit exxaggerated :lol:

Here's one of the valve springs instead.

Notice, the inner spring is a lot shorter than the outer one. Not knowing the measures I wonder if the inner one is unloaded when the valve is closed. This would reduce seat pressure. The "thing" between the springs would keep it from rattling.

Open length of the springs:
Outer 49.2 mm
Inner 38.5 mm
Attachments
Valve springs 1.jpg
Valve springs 1.jpg (164.83 KiB) Viewed 10468 times
la_strega_nera
Platinum
Platinum
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: Sunny Euro-Brisney

Post by la_strega_nera »

You'll find that at installed height all 3 springs are compressed to some extend.
The middle coil is a damper, its a push fit against the inner and outer coils and will dampen harmonics through friction. This is a Standard High performance valve spring design.
On the agricultural V8s we remove the inner and the damper for Cam break in, especially with stiff springs and agressive cam profiles, it helps prevent the lifters and lobes eating each other untill its all bedded in (Hold 2000-3000rpm for 30 minutes, you can shut it down inbetween if it gets too hot, then let it cool and re-fit the inner and dampers. pain in the ass of a job, but necessary when the lift rates are approaching the lifter edges....)
User avatar
Mats
Verde
Verde
Posts: 4059
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:26 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Mats »

There is a step in the retainer so the inner spring is loaded as well, the step also keeps the outer spring centered.
The springs are wound the same way, not too clever.
Mats Strandberg
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-

GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
User avatar
Micke
Verde
Verde
Posts: 810
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:33 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Micke »

I think the springs must be wound like this not to foul up with the middle thingy which goes the other way.
Jim K
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1751
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:10 am
Location: Athens,Greece

Post by Jim K »

DON'T USE THE DAMPER COIL. I don't know what they do in the US, but for AR engines the triple setup is exceptionally nonlinear and more than 210lbs at 10mm lift (way too much)! I've used these sets over and over again without the dampers, in same and opposite wind coils, no problems ever. For high perf use, aim for seat pressures of 85-90lbs and 185-190lbs at 10mm lift. These measuremants are made using the std AR retainer (most retainers have a 2mm step for the inner spring) Make sure your installed height allows max valve lift plus 1-2mm at least before coil bind.If you want the whole curve just say so and I'll post the numbers, or (for a schnitzel) the graph! :lol:
Jim K.
User avatar
Zamani
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1758
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:20 pm
Location: Cameroon

Post by Zamani »

Here you go JimGreek
Attachments
wiener_schnitzel.jpg
wiener_schnitzel.jpg (18.75 KiB) Viewed 10434 times
Jim K
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1751
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:10 am
Location: Athens,Greece

Post by Jim K »

Slurp,droool!! Rats, I'm licking the screen here!! :lol: :lol:
Ok, I is a man'o me word but its almost midnight now, will post the graphs tomorrow (std AR springs and hi-perf ones from Arricambi) What do you want, 4 or 6cyl?? (they're different)
Hey Z, got some ice-cream for dessert? :lol:
Jim K.
User avatar
Micke
Verde
Verde
Posts: 810
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:33 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Micke »

4 cyl OF COURSE!
Jim K
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1751
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:10 am
Location: Athens,Greece

Post by Jim K »

Better late than never! The damn Camedia kept shutting down on me...gotta get ACDSee again.
Anyway, I found the graph for the Arricambi (Shankle) 4cyl springs, but not the std ones. Don't worry, I got the stock numbers and they were exactly where the Shankle catalog said: seat pressure with installed height 35.5mm = 80lbs and pressure at 10mm lift (ie 25.5mm height) = 160lbs. Very important for high lift cams is the coil-bind height which for the performance springs is 20.5mm, in other words you can have up to 13mm safe valve lift!!
Don't bother with the two curves under the final one. They are the inner and outer spring graphs. They will NOT add up to the higher curve, as the inner spring is compressed 2mm by the retainer.
If you have lightweight valves you will logically need a value in between std and high perf, but it all depends on your max revs and cam design (specifically the acceleration features of the lobe)
Sorry for the quality guys, it is readable if you're determined enough!
Jim K.
Attachments
Arricambi springs,4cyl.jpg
Arricambi springs,4cyl.jpg (122.4 KiB) Viewed 10367 times
Post Reply