Author Message

<  Performance  ~  4-cylinder turbo performance

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:44 am
User avatarSilverSilverJoined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 5:46 amPosts: 45Location: Belgrade, Serbia
I went for NGK 9 because i have idle problems in the summer when the car is hot, very hot.
I mean, not problems, but its not as smooth as with these i had 7 and 8, 8 are ok all year round, but in hard driving with stock ignition 9 give me smoothest engine running both on and off throttle in the 40c outside temperature.

Jim do u drive you car in winter? at -10c or similar, isnt 15w oil little thick for this engine?


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:36 am
VerdeVerdeJoined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:10 amPosts: 1696Location: Athens,Greece
Yes I drive it all year round but -10*C?? In Athens we very rarely see less than -1*. The norm in winter is ~8-12*. Summer.... 42* is unfortunately frequent these last years. World climate changes....
Jim K.


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:11 am
GoldGoldJoined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 7:44 pmPosts: 190Location: Perth, Western Australia
Ahhh....... Athens has quite similiar weather to Perth, Western Australia.
I normally use NGK B6ES or B7ES :)


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 10:03 am
User avatarSilverSilverJoined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 5:46 amPosts: 45Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Thx Jim,

Mats u got brutal winters there, 15w not thick for u? i know 10w is default. or u dont drive turbo in the winter :)


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2014 1:46 pm
User avatarVerdeVerdeJoined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:26 amPosts: 4059Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
I never worry about the first number really, all modern oils are good enough.
Don't drive my hobby cars in the winter, no. But when I did drive my 75 T in the winter I used the same oil/plugs as in th summer.



_________________
Mats Strandberg
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-

GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
Offline Profile
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:55 pm
VerdeVerdeJoined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:10 amPosts: 1696Location: Athens,Greece
The 1.8T I built for a friend showed 346hp (314whp) and 440Nm (318ftlbs) at ~4500. I drove it and I don't like it as it doesn't have much under 3500. I had asked them to buy the GTX2860, but Garrett here didn't have it and gave them the GTX2863 instead... Bad move. 350hp at 1.8bar (26.5psi) is not bad but I still don't like it. The intercooler is very small and they didn't get any more power with more boost. I asked them to take it up to ~2.2bar(32.4psi) but no luck. The owner is happy with the result so I'm happily out of the loop.
That's why I'm getting the GTX2860 for mine -maybe next week? Its a bolt-on replacement for my GT2871 even using the same water/oil pipes. I certainly expect better low speed performance and the possibility to exceed 2bar (29psi) provided the MSD6530 advance map can cope -that will be the result of very many uphill runs with the help of Knocklink and ...the human ear!
Jim K.


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:18 am
SilverSilverJoined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:42 amPosts: 7
Interesting thread, looking forward to seeing the end results.

Suggestions and queries:

1. Agree with others, air filter needs to go, I have seen this style of airfilter sucked into the compressor housing. I am surprised you only lost 2-3Hp through it, but as Hp increases the loss will also increase of course. Perhaps you can route the pipe to near the headlight? That would get it away from warm air also.
2. Are you able to use E85 fuel? You will enjoy less knock (but worse fuel consumption), and so will be able to wind in some more boost for given timing.
3. I do not expect a large change for the 2860, I think you will still be less than impressed with the lag, just a reality of higher mass turbo rotating assemblies. Of course I fully support your quest for yet more and more Hp :-).
4. Interesting conversation on squish before, my take on it is even in a turbo engine a smaller effective chamber is more desirable (less surface area for heat ot dissipate through). My understadning is that to achieve true squish (ie a volume where the flame can not effectively travel, the final gap must be less than 0.5mm, otherwise, the flame will traverse the gap).
5. what are peoples thoughts about very large turbines and larger overlap cams, in the quest for higher peak power (Jim, I know this goes against your quest for a good torque spread for streetability)? That is, seeking the possitve pressure ratio across the head? You should install a pressure gauge pre and post turbine. This will be very informative.
6. does this engine have piston oil squirters built into the block standard? I understadn they do?
Really enjoying this thread. I hope I can chime in with some dyno results of my own in the near future. I am running a 2L 8 valve engine....I am sure someone will take pleasure in telling me I am about to split a liner!

A pick of mine.
Attachments:
DSCF2823.JPG
DSCF2823.JPG [ 163.63 KiB | Viewed 2091 times ]

Offline Profile
PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 6:36 pm
VerdeVerdeJoined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:10 amPosts: 1696Location: Athens,Greece
Here is the graph with wheel figures. Again, I don't like the non-existence of low range. I hope to improve a lot (in my car) with the GTX2860. There are no oil jets in these engines. Its not a question of lag, but of late spooling we have here. Reading the GTX2863 vs 2860 specs will show why.
Image
Jim K.


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 4:26 am
VerdeVerdeJoined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 7:06 pmPosts: 1552
Jim, those are great numbers. Although the low end seems weak, it's important to remember this is all relative. Even at 3000rpm it has more power than just about any NA 2.0 has at peak power, and more than most NA 3.0 V6s have at that RPM.


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:13 am
VerdeVerdeJoined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:10 amPosts: 1696Location: Athens,Greece
Wheel figures:
At 3k: ~60hp, 150Nm (109ftlbs), 0.15bar (2psi) boost
at 4k: ~185hp, 330Nm (239ftlbs), 1.05bar (15.2psi) boost
at 5k: ~295hp, 420Nm (304ftlbs), 1.8bar (26psi) boost
at 6k: ~310hp, 375Nm (271ftlbs), 1.75bar (25psi) boost
I would prefer a much better lower end... We'll see how mine pans out. Like I said, max power for me doesn't mean much out of the racetrack; it's just an ego trip. And then, there's always the question of driver ability -being able to handle power. Naturally enough, most people disagree with this!
Jim K.


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:17 am
VerdeVerdeJoined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 7:06 pmPosts: 1552
OH, I was looking at the wrong scale. I thought you had around 150hp at 300rpm. Yeah, with only 60hp there, you need more.


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 8:46 pm
User avatarVerdeVerdeJoined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:37 amPosts: 2295Location: Brisbane, Australia
Hey Greaser,

Why don't you stop scratching your butt looking for nuggets and fit a twin charge.
A supercharger for the bottom and a hair drier for the top. Best of both worlds.

If Shakespeare was alive today, he would snuffle you for top drama queen role I am certain. :mrgreen:



_________________
Transaxle Alfas Haul More Arse
Offline Profile
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 4:00 am
VerdeVerdeJoined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:10 amPosts: 1696Location: Athens,Greece
Wise words from the 'Weirdo of Oz' or toilet bowl poetry? I think you have a blow-off valve issue! Try olive oil+valve grinding paste :lol:
Jim K.


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 9:53 pm
User avatarVerdeVerdeJoined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 amPosts: 677Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)


_________________
Banned.. ? ;-) Daily donky.. ==> BMW 118d Image
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool :twisted: ==> definitely BANNED!

AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
Offline Profile
PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:13 am
VerdeVerdeJoined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:10 amPosts: 1696Location: Athens,Greece
The purpose of this 1.8T project is to come up with the best cost/performance solution without changing the original basics and the daily driver character of the car. The project is ~80% done, the only things remaining are the new snail, high-Z injectors and possibly a better intercooler radiator -remember the stock IC has been converted for water cooling. Thanks to std pistons/rods durability, no special forged components are needed even for serious trackday use. Stay tuned for end of story and dyno results with the GT2871 and GTX2860 snails.
Jim K.


Offline Profile

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:

All times are UTC - 8 hours
Page 25 of 27
394 posts Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
Search for:
Post new topic  Reply to topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
cron