Anything that does not fit into other topics.
Post Reply
User avatar
75evo
Verde
Verde
Posts: 944
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:56 am

75 3.2 Vs 156 3,2

Post by 75evo »

User avatar
Maurizio
Verde
Verde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)

Re: 75 3.2 Vs 156 3,2

Post by Maurizio »

I think this 75 is more then a 3.2 but I'm not sure.
Further more this is almost a silhouette race. Very extensive modified.
Attachments
comp_DSC00285.JPG
comp_DSC00285.JPG (75.1 KiB) Viewed 3778 times
Last edited by Maurizio on Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Banned.. ? ;-) Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d Image
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool :twisted: ==> definitely BANNED!

AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
User avatar
Maurizio
Verde
Verde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)

Re: 75 3.2 Vs 156 3,2

Post by Maurizio »

too give some idea...
These picture are actually taken @spa same day as the youtube inboard.
Attachments
compDSC00293.JPG
compDSC00293.JPG (82.13 KiB) Viewed 3778 times
compDSC00290.JPG
compDSC00290.JPG (72.89 KiB) Viewed 3778 times
Banned.. ? ;-) Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d Image
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool :twisted: ==> definitely BANNED!

AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
User avatar
75evo
Verde
Verde
Posts: 944
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:56 am

Re: 75 3.2 Vs 156 3,2

Post by 75evo »

Nice Photos! Was this on the dutch forum? His car is not as serious as the IMSA cars. It still has the original chassis and not complete tube frame like the Van Putten, Henk Thuis, et al cars.

The owner claims it's a 3,2 and it is slower than the Ron Sanen's 156 GTA. Maybe aero issue?
User avatar
Giuliettaevo2
Verde
Verde
Posts: 790
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 11:56 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: 75 3.2 Vs 156 3,2

Post by Giuliettaevo2 »

I believe it is an original 3,2 GTA engine, no internal changes to the engine.

Ron Sanen is a very good driver, that doesn't help the 75 driver.. :wink:

Has the original chassis? Not much of it then.. :? At the picture i'm looking over the gearbox and there is not even a floorpan there.. :shock:
Drive it like you stole it...
User avatar
Maurizio
Verde
Verde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:49 am
Location: the Netherlands, 153.1km from the N'ring :-)

Re: 75 3.2 Vs 156 3,2

Post by Maurizio »

75evo wrote:Nice Photos! Was this on the dutch forum? His car is not as serious as the IMSA cars. It still has the original chassis and not complete tube frame like the Van Putten, Henk Thuis, et al cars.

The owner claims it's a 3,2 and it is slower than the Ron Sanen's 156 GTA. Maybe aero issue?
These are photo's I made , I was on spa that race :wink:
It is not completely tube frame base, but already a very serious modified car. It was the fastest transaxle based alfa that day on spa 8)

Complete front of this 75 is reworked, tubular and at least 15 [cm] wider. Almost the complete floor aluminum sheet.
Behind the driver there is a polycarbonate shield to close the cabin and the rest of the back is open (to cool the gear box I guess).
Banned.. ? ;-) Daily donky.. ==> BMW 325d Image
E36M3 (3.0) Ringtool :twisted: ==> definitely BANNED!

AR 75 TS Ringtool '90, AR Spider 2000 veloce '79
Post Reply