User avatar
GregoryV
Platinum
Platinum
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:43 am
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Post by GregoryV »

Hey - and nice job on the alternator, I'm gonna copy cat that one from you just so you know! :)

GV
20-Years-3-Motors-Later
User avatar
x-rad
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: Canton, Ohio, USA

Post by x-rad »

well....all that wiring mess is coming out so I can use the standard Bosch to break in the new engine.

WHAT A PITA..

thanks gregory...you don't have to grind the face of the alternator as much as I did because the pulley sticks out a little more than stock. I have to put a thin washer in to space correctly..
User avatar
GregoryV
Platinum
Platinum
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:43 am
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Post by GregoryV »

Cool :) Can't believe that headgasket problem is still there?!

Reminds me of my 73 Capri I once had - rebuilt a killer motor for it with a Wieand manifold, started it up with clouds of vapor out the exhaust - number 5 cylinder had filled with water and hydrolocked! Resleeved it thinking I must not have done the manifold gasket properly, was about to start up the new motor again, but decided to pull the plugs first and water came pooring out the #5! After tons of investigating it turned out the "new" manifold had a pin-hole leak from the water jacket into the #5 plenum!! And of course the way parts go they get the disclaimer that they are only responsible for the replacing the defecting part!

That one really tested my patience to the point that I didn't rebuild a motor again for many years ... anyway, hang in there on it. :)

GV
20-Years-3-Motors-Later
User avatar
x-rad
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: Canton, Ohio, USA

Post by x-rad »

Thanks Gregory...
well i think the gasket problem (now number 3) is really a block problem...lucky I have a spare

Now the question is should I take the new (and they are new) liners out of the bad block and put them in the 'hot' engine...or should I just go with the liners I honed myself( which were still in spec and are already installed)?

had some more trying times this weekend......was fitting up the C+B cams to the other 'new' set of heads and clearance was way off...could not even turn the cam because the train was just locking up...spent about an hour with the head guy changing valves , shims, springs, buckets, washers...etc.....Nothing worked

I figured it was that the cams came off a 2.5 head and there must have been some kind of difference......

but all the parts looked the same..buckets same length...except the oversized valves have a little more length above the retainers (i guess to increase spring pressure slightly?)

this morning i was about to give up and list the cams on Ebay...then it hit me

shims and retainers might be different..

YEP...shims thinner by at least .02 inch AND valve spring retainer is different...3.0 has 3 little dots on top and the "INTAKE" valve sits lower by at least 2-3mm. Different retainers for intake and exhaust!!So all this should work..I just have to run the parts over to the shop later.

Also, we replaced all guides with mag bronze, counter sunk the guides 2-3mm further to increase valve seal clearance for the extra cam lift
Also, we gained more clearance by recessing the inner portion of the valve spring seat. all this so we don't crush the seals...and he did a real nice job grinding the bore edge so that the intake cam lobes fit.

started with the teflon/nylon valve seals but they just sit too tall and Gerry the shop guy says any little scratch and they leak. He says the standard viton seals are the best.....so now I have to get some of those..
User avatar
x-rad
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: Canton, Ohio, USA

Post by x-rad »

Got viton seals and six new 3.0 intake valves today as the oversized valves were just a little too worn...better to do a good job on these heads .
Attachments
C+B's almost brand new
C+B's almost brand new
IMG_2483.JPG (83.01 KiB) Viewed 8407 times
no shaft ridges or wear spots..need to cut a back angle
no shaft ridges or wear spots..need to cut a back angle
IMG_2493.JPG (12.82 KiB) Viewed 8406 times
User avatar
x-rad
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: Canton, Ohio, USA

Post by x-rad »

I am really impressed by Gerry the head guy, he doing some decent port and runner work included in the rest of the package.

Now that he has purchased or made the tools required to do the valve guides, and will soon cut the stone for the seats, he has gotten to know these heads pretty well. His machine work is excellent and honestly, i was looking for any nicks or scratches around the spring seats and around the conbustion chamber and I could not find any visible marks....


We shall see how it all goes together but this guy seems like the real deal. His is very helpful and worked with me(and I am a picky SOB) on all the little details.
User avatar
mjr
Platinum
Platinum
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:01 pm
Location: G Britain

Post by mjr »

hmm, x rad, looking at your haltech install, Im starting to wonder weather to go ahead with MS11 or not?, your haltech looks easier and just as good. How does it compare to MS? ease of install, tuning etc.
User avatar
x-rad
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: Canton, Ohio, USA

Post by x-rad »

Haltech is very easy to install...but i have only the fuel control from haltech. You will need a cam or crank pos sensor for the full system.

I have installed full haltech systems and they were very straightforward (except for one mislabled wire)

Never installe MS so I don't know about them

download the haltech program from their new system and try it out

'Haltech' on the web
User avatar
mjr
Platinum
Platinum
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:01 pm
Location: G Britain

Post by mjr »

X rad, thanks will look them up. I only want fuel for now, I am doing some mild tuning on a 2.5, so need to sort fuel out, I will do ignition later. MS is good, but seems so expensive. Did you set up a wideband O2 sensor for tuning? how did you get your intial start up maps?
User avatar
x-rad
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: Canton, Ohio, USA

Post by x-rad »

wideband bosch O2 sensor was 50$ on the net. Haltech accepts the wideband inputs(wideband sensor has a much more gentle slope than standard O2 sensor giving more accurate readings - hence the name)

Initially..engine started right up and ran rich per the given settings of the Haltech.

Did some basic tuning with my laptop to get near stoich (really easy)for most throttle positions....but then blew head gasket

so it's sitting right now.

Just got a call from Gerry the head guy and heads are ready!! will pick them up tomorrow.
User avatar
x-rad
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: Canton, Ohio, USA

Post by x-rad »

Got the heads back :P :P I did not port polish them to save some cash but Gerry cleaned up the ports anyway for me.

Here are some pics....

ATTENTION: I am promoting the guy who did the head work on my 3.0L in the next few paragraphs. I am doing this because Alfa owners out there who need good work done for a good price may want to talk to him.

If you are in the Detroit/Ann Arbor area and you need head work, call this guy Gerry at Berkside (BHperformance)

http://www.mspmall.com/bhp/

NOTE THE NEW PHONE NUMBER not yet changed on the site!! 734-455-1905

Gerry does the machine work in his shop and is very accessable if you want to keep track of what is going on. he was always polite and charges a very reasonable rate. The work is first class and will be EXACTLY what you want without mistakes or waste.

I am a picky SOB and he did everything I asked and made several good suggestions and mods. He has tons of knowledge about heads and porting from years of racing experience.
Attachments
recessed dome around seats and narrowed seats for better seating and flow
recessed dome around seats and narrowed seats for better seating and flow
IMG_2517.JPG (93.11 KiB) Viewed 8255 times
exhaust spring cup and guide lowered about 1.5mm
exhaust spring cup and guide lowered about 1.5mm
IMG_2516.JPG (74.59 KiB) Viewed 8256 times
exhaust guide lowered about 1.5mm
exhaust guide lowered about 1.5mm
IMG_2513.JPG (75.44 KiB) Viewed 8255 times
intake guide and lower valve spring cup lowered about 2+mm
intake guide and lower valve spring cup lowered about 2+mm
IMG_2515.JPG (51.45 KiB) Viewed 8255 times
follower bore recessed for bigger lobes
follower bore recessed for bigger lobes
IMG_2514.JPG (56.29 KiB) Viewed 8255 times
Last edited by x-rad on Sat Sep 22, 2007 11:31 am, edited 5 times in total.
User avatar
x-rad
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: Canton, Ohio, USA

Post by x-rad »

more pics...
Attachments
relieved valves...cut back on top of head
relieved valves...cut back on top of head
IMG_2512.JPG (53.38 KiB) Viewed 8251 times
intake and exhaust  lower valve spring cup machined down in centers to allow lower placement of guide and guide seal.
intake and exhaust lower valve spring cup machined down in centers to allow lower placement of guide and guide seal.
IMG_2505.JPG (40.88 KiB) Viewed 8252 times
User avatar
x-rad
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: Canton, Ohio, USA

Post by x-rad »

More stuff:

Ok..got all the vlaves labled and matched to corresponding seat when they were ground. Noticed that some retainers sit lower on the stem than others making a clearance issue in some instances.

Turns out that there are two obviously different valve spring retainers, one with 3 dots on top and one with smooth top. However, even when using only 3dot retainers, I was still having clearance issues (same setup producing different lobe clearances)

Turns out that when i measured inner diameters of each retainer on a jewlers ring gauge, there are at least 4 distinct inner diameters for two types of retainers. In my pic you can see size groupings with two groups of six representing the most closely matched retainers and which did not seem to be stretched in the center (like a porn stars a**!)

Also, there are two different types of valve retainer locks (little 1/2 circle things) If you look closely, one has a small inner grove right below the radius (not a wear mark) and the others don't. Some of these retainers were damaged and were not reused in the measuring. These two types of retainers each make a different stem height above the spring retainer affecting clearance differently. some were more worn than others so obviously, I ordered new ones (almost 2$ each!)


TIP: for trial settings of valves and quick change of parts, i suggest you use a spare spring off the exhaust rocker arm shaft(if you have one)...just the right size and strength and you can still turn the cam with your fingers. I would not recommend anything but the right valve springs for setting shim heights, though!. To remove the exhaust rocker arm shaft, you only have to remove big allen screw, shaft is tapped for screw for easy removal.

so all parts laid out and matched. Found a few errors made by last person to put together one set of heads I have for spare parts.
1) Valve guides too high and seals smashed
2) damaged follower bores and buckets
3) valve springs not right diameter and too stiff
4) exhaust rocker arm shaft in backward (oil holes should line up with arms)
5) hardened washer left out of spring cups
Attachments
almost ready, just need new retainer locks...
almost ready, just need new retainer locks...
IMG_2520.JPG (151.83 KiB) Viewed 8195 times
User avatar
x-rad
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: Canton, Ohio, USA

Post by x-rad »

OK..more stuff.

Heads clean, bench clean, new cardboard, ready to go....


springs and parts under MUCH pressure when compressed, don't put your eye in direct line...
Attachments
I try not to let the head mating surface touch the bench if possible...piece of wood supports a non-mating edge
I try not to let the head mating surface touch the bench if possible...piece of wood supports a non-mating edge
IMG_2611.jpg (119.89 KiB) Viewed 8096 times
valve locks placed with 'stats'..curved end make it easy as long as retainer is compressed in far enough...a little oil on the locks keeps them in place until you slowly release the compressor
valve locks placed with 'stats'..curved end make it easy as long as retainer is compressed in far enough...a little oil on the locks keeps them in place until you slowly release the compressor
IMG_2610.jpg (118.61 KiB) Viewed 8096 times
tape 'protects' the head surface....
tape 'protects' the head surface....
IMG_2609.jpg (103.47 KiB) Viewed 8095 times
Tools needed: I like the double ended compressor. It has adjustable ends and metal compression piece. This is for trucks but fits perfectly.  Lightly clamp the  handle and twist the valve head end like a C-clamp and everything works out.
Tools needed: I like the double ended compressor. It has adjustable ends and metal compression piece. This is for trucks but fits perfectly. Lightly clamp the handle and twist the valve head end like a C-clamp and everything works out.
IMG_2604.jpg (95.77 KiB) Viewed 8095 times
IAP springs have a sharp end and a 'cut?' end...end with cut fits bucket/retainer side better
IAP springs have a sharp end and a 'cut?' end...end with cut fits bucket/retainer side better
IMG_2608.jpg (90.35 KiB) Viewed 8097 times
Last edited by x-rad on Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:06 pm, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
x-rad
Verde
Verde
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: Canton, Ohio, USA

Post by x-rad »

More stuff:

Since we sunk the guides justa little more than normal, we had to machine down the lower spring cup.

Make sure lower spring cup goes on BEFORE vlave seal

Driving in new seals...make sure you use something nearly equal in diameter so that you are putting force on the metal edge of the seal and not the soft rubber part. seals can be distorted easily. Seal has to be driven in just beyond the front edge of the seal housing or it can get damaged

some seal are better than others. not all have the internal spring. The ones that you buy individually from IAP are pretty good..but the ones in the total engine kit are different and IMO not as well made
Attachments
driving seal gently down...you know when it's in far enough because the sound changes (sounds like metal rather than rubber)  just make sure it is seated all the way around and as square as possible...
driving seal gently down...you know when it's in far enough because the sound changes (sounds like metal rather than rubber) just make sure it is seated all the way around and as square as possible...
IMG_2600.jpg (94.42 KiB) Viewed 8092 times
13mm socket and extension and rubber body mallet work well together
13mm socket and extension and rubber body mallet work well together
IMG_2599.jpg (82.79 KiB) Viewed 8094 times
this is my test guide machined down a little more so we could test fit for depth...you can also see how well the seal sits on it...
this is my test guide machined down a little more so we could test fit for depth...you can also see how well the seal sits on it...
IMG_2603.jpg (65.14 KiB) Viewed 8095 times
make sure you have a lower spring bucket (this one is machined so the seal can sit lower) in first, then the seal is driven on, then the hardened washer placed, then the springs and the rest..
make sure you have a lower spring bucket (this one is machined so the seal can sit lower) in first, then the seal is driven on, then the hardened washer placed, then the springs and the rest..
IMG_2598.jpg (84.07 KiB) Viewed 8095 times
Seal puller (about 12$) be very careful using this tool..it will gouge aluminum very easily!!!  I try to 'pull' from top down (not like in the pic) in case of a gouge, less likely to leak (can be filled with permatex when putting new seal on)
Seal puller (about 12$) be very careful using this tool..it will gouge aluminum very easily!!! I try to 'pull' from top down (not like in the pic) in case of a gouge, less likely to leak (can be filled with permatex when putting new seal on)
IMG_2605.jpg (91.95 KiB) Viewed 8093 times
Post Reply