Page 3 of 6

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:18 am
by Giuliettaevo2
The diff is open and not strong and i'm told the ring and pinion are also weaker due to their size. :(

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:29 am
by 75evo
Questions for Alan, or anyone out there, about lifter/tappet for the 24v.

Are they identical to the 16V lifters? Some of my lifters have discolored a bit, probably due to a little but of surface corrosion, but I cleaned them up.

Or what is the proper way to refurbish them? They need to be slightly dished? The slightly part sounds a potentially inaccurate process of making them "accurate".

I can get TS 16V lifters for cheap, hence the question. 24v lifters are UKP18.50 each. 24 X 18.5 = 444. Robbery.

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:06 am
by AlanV6
I know that 33 16V has the same lifters, but not sure about 2.0 engines.

I read a little about total seal rings, should i try them? All of you that use them, did you change all three or just top?

Maybe any specs for the top one on 24V, which one is the most apropriate?

Thanks.

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:42 am
by AlanV6
I'll go for goetze rings, no real advantage in total seal as i read on few forums...

Making bob weights (part one)

Image

Image


Main pulley undersized (lighter 600 grams and smaller 8%)

Image

Image


main vs water pump pulley

Image

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:24 pm
by AlanV6
Finnaly weighted all pieces and calculated bob weights...

Jim i assume you weighted big ends and then calculated small end weight? Because i get same numbers that way (within 1-2 grams) but if i weight small end it's around 179-180g and not 184g like if calculated...
I guess that is up to some friction betwen materials when weighting the rods in parallel. I calculated that even if i use my numbers it wouldnt make such a big difference as it would be like 50% factor (i'm using 51%)

My bob weights will be 880g (a little lighter pistons than in your book)

Some pics:

small end weighting (i then weighted big ends too and numbers were around 438g)

Image


Lightest and heaviest conrod (suprised how accurate they are from factory!)

Image

lithle grind off the big ends to get them all in less than a gram...

Image

pistons

Image

difference is big here (because they are from 2 used engines - same B class ofcourse)

Image

after a lot of grinding it's there

Image

All calculations :mrgreen:

Image

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:24 pm
by Jim K
:shock: :shock: Let me note the place you removed weight from the pistons underneath the pin boss is the absolute WORST place you could choose! That area is what keeps the piston from flying off during the exhaust stroke when it also exerts the maximum tension on the rod! :shock: :shock: :wall:
Additionally, what I see in the picture is the wrong way to suspend a rod big end for weighing. See V6 book, pp68, bottom left pic. Its small but you can clearly see the suspending arrangement for both big and small ends, which have small bearings (~12mm diameter) in the middle and are held by articulated levers (also with small bearings.
You weigh each end in the way shown and you use that weight for the calculation. Actual total rod weight is not used in calculating bobweights however, all rods must of course weigh exactly the same. Arriving at equal end weights between rods is not easy as you have probably seen. First you equalize small/big end weights and then you adjust total weight from the beam. And please grind away those block lumps from each end, they are not needed!
Jim K.

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 12:51 am
by AlanV6
Thanks for that. Well about piston grinding, i saw it on some videos that they grind away at that place... I didnt grind much and i found out that the lightest pistons are a little thinner right in that area (from my second engine). I'm still learning things...
About rod weighting, i changed the method after that pic, i used a bearing too, and weighted all rods 3 times on each end and on two different scales. I got repeatable number within 1 gram so i think it's ok.
So you say i should go all the way with rods and grind blocks to lighten them? Hmm maybe :mrgreen:

About pistons lightening, you take away material inside the crown?

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 4:36 am
by Jim K
You don't have to touch the piston alloy at all. All required weight can be removed in a lathe or with a Dremel hand-grinder from the inside edge if the piston pin by grinding at ~45* angle. Steel has much higher specific weight than the piston alloy so you grind away much less volume.
Jim K.

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:46 am
by AlanV6
Haha i know and it's written in the book too. i just forogot lol. Well i grind the pins on others and it's allreally nice now. you can see the numbers it's all in 0.1g!

Image

I washed all pistons and pins in soapy water

Image

Weighted all again today and final bobweight number is 881g

Cutting in half

Image

They are 870g + cable ties 11g

Image


Then i tried flexhone tool on an old very poor liner

Image


2 times 15sec right and left rotation and it's really nice even on poor liner

Image

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:04 pm
by AlanV6
Liners in factory tolerances, almost no ovality (still i'm gonna align the widest part with crank)

Image


Bobweights done all insde 0,2g! (with cable ties ofcourse)

Image

Image

Image

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:32 pm
by AlanV6
Going to the balancer today :lol:


Image

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 8:26 am
by 75evo
Lovely, I can't wait for my big heavy package from Greece!!!!

BTW, how much lift does your AHM cams have? Can you put it on a cam doctor and give some info on the curve? After much discussion with JK, we are down to ...... very low 10.2mm lift! I am afraid to bring the topic up with him again because it might drop down to 9.X . :lol:

It started out at a lofty 11.Xmm :mrgreen: . I was very happy then. :roll: :D

Although I could still go with 11.Xmm cams but risk wrecking the lifter/cams. We decided on something that would not cause any catastrophic failure.

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:17 am
by Mats
Coward....

:wall:











:D

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 11:19 am
by Jim K
You all going crazy with lift? Why? What's wrong with 10mm? Both the 3liter and the GTA have 9.3mm, the GTA having a bit more duration. By regrinding either cam, the best you can end up with is 10mm and 226* @ 1.25mm, while the GTA has 220*, the 3liter 208*, my Williams 222*. Therefore, 10mm and 226* @ 1.25mm has to be a hell of a cam! You want better? Go pay 1300€ !! :roll:
Ok, here's the magic Cam-Doctor screen shot for you guys. Inner red is std 3liter, next is GTA (notice flat nose), blue is my Williams and the black is the most you can get out of the 3liter without excessively decreasing the base circle -in which case you have follower problems.
Jim K.

Re: My engine 3.0 V6 24V

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 11:43 am
by Mats
So when you say "risk of breaking cams/lobes" are you talking about reducing base circle? What about keeping base and go larger? 8)
Yeah, sure, you probably need to make room for it but then again, it wouldn't be the first time... :wink: