Did you try droop stop only in front?
I wouldn't want it in the back (I cannot imagine any advantage having a droop stop in the rear of a RWD car)
Also, having a droop stop in the front and adjusted very "tight" shouldn't make the car unpredictable. Might induce too much US but this is still to see.
Even on a very smooth track (i.e. not the Ring) it will be the wobbliest/jerkiest ride ever unless you actually lift a wheel, but then you have stuff to think about anyway.
Think about what happens when you are riding the bumpstops in the corners, it's the same feeling, totally unprogressive...
Think about what happens when you are riding the bumpstops in the corners, it's the same feeling, totally unprogressive...
Mats Strandberg
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-
GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
-Scuderia Rosso- Now burned to the ground...
-onemanracing.com-
-Strandberg.photography-
GTV 2000 -77 - Died in the fire.
155 V6 Sport -96 - Sold!
Micke
On my 116, I have made some hold down clamps at the base of the springs to keep them in place as they are shorter than standard. This is in place of droop straps. Works well.
This is a feature of 105 cars as a standard fitting but I beleive the movement restriction is more to do with preventing the spring going west than for any handling gains on the limit as the travel length allowed is huge.(I cannot imagine any advantage having a droop stop in the rear of a RWD car)
On my 116, I have made some hold down clamps at the base of the springs to keep them in place as they are shorter than standard. This is in place of droop straps. Works well.
- Attachments
-
- Rear Spring Hold Down 2.jpg (192.29 KiB) Viewed 3962 times
Transaxle Alfas Haul More Arse